While the benefits of sending a human mission to Mars would be colossal, arranging the budget to do so is another matter. Humans could be sent to visit an asteroid, to establish a long-duration base on the Moon, or to explore Mars and its small moons. Sending humans to Mars is estimated to cost tens of billions of dollars (at the low end), and the added complexity of living astronauts makes for a … While humans on Mars would be able to accomplish more rigorous science at a faster pace, Curiosity only cost $2.5 billion. By this we implore you to not just think of that feeling for the astronaut, but the exp… There is a … Some downtime: in between Moonwalks, Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt pose for photos inside of the Lunar Module. Today at NASA, there are no active long-term goals. Scientist Stephen Hawking claims that humans need to colonize planets in the next 1,000 years to ensure survival. Unless we radically adapt our brains and bodies to the harsh Martian environment, the Red Planet will forever remain off limits to humans. On Mars, that means we could trigger a deliberate greenhouse gas effect that would melt the ice at the poles, release a load of CO2, make the atmosphere denser, … Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should. 1. It is wrong for members of today’s society to assume that the universe is there for our taking. The agency often reiterates that its on a "Journey to Mars," but they've yet to lay out any detailed plans for how they're actually going to get there. We cannot rule out a common ancestor for Earth life and possible present or past Mars life. Have a question, idea or feedback for Bad Philosopher? In deep-space while en-route back to Earth, Apollo astronauts had to step outside in order to retrieve film cassettes from the Command Module's external cameras. These are not simple endeavors, and they wouldn't be possible on the shoestring budget of the ISS; they would be to be costly, complicated, and risky, but ultimately beneficial—both scientifically and culturally. Our mission statement is to produce cutting-edge content that strikes at the core of what it means to exist in this vast, vicious, and incomprehensible cosmos of ours. Spaceflight is inherently risky, for both astronauts and robots alike. A few more reasons why we shouldn’t move to Mars include the facts that it’s too cold for us to survive without an abundance of extremely reliable technology, the atmosphere is so thin it counts as a laboratory vacuum on Earth, there are rough and global dust storms and much more, according to Scientist Robert Walker. No we shouldn't go to mars. Image: NASA. The Five Deadliest Human Spaceflight Disasters in History. The first would be the pointless endeavour of searching for life; the second would be the cost of such an activity, and the third would be the undoubted risk of space exploration. When astronauts first stepped foot on the Moon in the 60's and 70's, they were doing cutting-edge science. , you see, when you want to land on a planet or moon, because of the low gravity you have to push thrusters away from the surface so you don't go in really fast and crash. Mars is barred: why we shouldn't go to the red planet – Science Weekly podcast Elon Musk believes we should colonise Mars to ensure the survival of the human race . According to an article published recently by Business Insider, there are multiple reasons why the human race should migrate to Mars once the time comes that it is possible, one of them being that it will ensure the survival of our species. This is why Mars landings often include rockets firing toward the ground – so-called retro-rockets -- that help slow down the descent. There are 3 main reasons why we shouldn't go to mars. And many more of these types of missions could be launched if NASA were to slash its human spaceflight budget. this includes not increasing the population at such alarming rates, lowering our tendency to burn fossil fuels, no longer cutting down such a large and unnecessary amount of trees, dumping less waste into the ocean and much more. An article published in the New York Times explains how monotonous and unnatural life on Mars would really be. If Americans do not go to Mars, someone else will. 6. All the Reasons Why Humans Shouldn’t Colonize Mars, According to Experts Just Visiting. To deploy a communications satellite on-orbit and conduct other simple experiments and tasks. Nearly fifty years later, the science returned by the Apollo program is still the most comprehensive scientific data we've ever collected beyond Earth. Many people agree that we should go to mars but I disagree. However, there is also no way to guarantee that our species will survive permanently on Mars, either. Wrong. The Apollo missions returned hundreds of kilograms worth of moon rocks to Earth and gathered a treasure trove of data pertaining to the lunar environment. A few more reasons why we shouldn’t move to Mars include the facts that it’s too cold for us to survive without an abundance of extremely reliable technology, the atmosphere is so thin it counts as a laboratory vacuum on Earth, there are rough and global dust storms and much more, according to Scientist Robert Walker. That said, once we do start sending astronauts out to actually explore the cosmos once again, let's make our efforts really count. Even though this is all true the rejecting side has claims that outweigh these reasons to go. Could Cryo-Freezing Dead Bodies One Day Make Us Immortal? We should take this giant scientific leap only when we are ready, and we shouldn’t subject our brave astronauts—and the success of the missions—to undue risk. 3.3% of all the people who have gone into space have died doing so. [T]he first argument against human travel to Mars: contamination. Moving to Mars is the large-scale form of staying home from school so that you can miss a test that you haven’t studied for and avoiding your responsibilities. An on-orbit rendezvous: the Lunar Module reunites with the Command Module after a successful 3-day mission down to the surface of the Moon. There are some ways to undo the damage we have done to the Earth in order to avoid the dull and abnormal way of life that awaits us on Mars. NASA hasn't made any concrete plans as to how it's going to use its next-generation Orion space capsule and SLS rocket, so the agency's future direction is shrouded in uncertainty. Instead, they're employed doing menial experiments in the microgravity environment of the International Space Station (ISS), stranded in Low-Earth Orbit. And that spells political and economic benefit for whoever succeeds. But, we won’t know if a permanent presence is possible until we try. Do your part to save our home, rather than trashing it and moving on to the next planet, only to trash that one too with time. It's always a concern when sending surface probes to pristine worlds such as Mars that... 2. ... "I refer to them as the Martians and the Lunatics – the people who want to go to Mars… But what is certain is that NASA is committed to maintaining the ISS until 'at least' 2024—at which point it will have been 55 years since Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the Moon for the first time, and 52 years since the last human beings had traveled beyond Low-Earth Orbit. Rocks can be analyzed by automated probes and robots without risking human life and spending very much money. pgmrdlm writes: Bill Nye says the idea of Mars colonization and terraforming -- making a planet more Earth-like by modifying its atmosphere -- is science fiction. Both types of radiation could damage DNA and increase you on getting cancer. Saturn’s largest moon Titan is the only natural satellite with more than a trace atmosphere. The Curiosity rover on Mars: "did somebody say ultra good-looking and cost-effective robot!?". Besides, there's a pretty good argument to be had that the ISS isn't worth maintaining anyways! I'm the creator of Bad Philosopher. Most recently, George W. Bush wanted humans to return to the Moon, and so NASA began building the Orion capsule and SLS rocket to do so. The catch? If we're going to subject human beings to the inherent risks of spaceflight, it should be for a really good reason. “A Dutch nonprofit venture called Mars One aspires to send four people to Mars by 2026 as the beginning of a permanent human settlement,” according to the New York Times. If humans do eventually land on Mars, they would not arrive alone. We should respect another human's life to the extent that we wouldn't seek to endanger that life on some trivial mission. Since the Apollo program formally ended in the early 1970's, human spaceflight has never been the same. But today in 2017, we're not learning anything significant by having astronauts living and working in space for extended periods of time. good argument to be had that the ISS isn't worth maintaining, Naturally Occurring Existential Risks: An Overview, Human-Caused Existential Risks: An Overview, Four Reasons We Haven't Yet Detected Alien Civilizations, We’ve Seeded the Moon with Life, Now Let's See if it can Survive. Instead of funding the space station, we could have the funds to send probes to Venus, orbiters and landers to the moons of Jupiter, a followup to Cassini that could also explore Enceladus and Titan, and a new mission that could revisit Uranus and Neptune (considering it's been around 30 years since Voyager 2 first visited). In deep-space while en-route back to Earth, Apollo astronauts had to step outside in order to retrieve film cassettes from the Command Module's external cameras. Here on Earth, we employ robots in a variety of areas where it makes financial sense to do so—underwater exploration robots for ocean science, automated balloons for atmospheric science, combat drones for warfare, and a multitude of robotic machines for manufacturing. Patriotism helped get us to the Moon. WE DON'T NEED TO PLANT FLAGS ON MARS With the recent discovery of flowing liquid water on Mars, talk has turned to what it would take to colonize Mars. It was an extreme long-shot, and one that actually paid off. NASA Astronaut Explains Why We Should Send Humans To Mars (VIDEO) ... “There have been a lot of clues we’ve seen that there is potentially life on Mars, but the only way to find out is really to go there,” he told The Huffington Post during a community event held by NASA on Wednesday in New York City. There aren't many discoveries being made on board the ISS, and the money being spent up there might be better spent on robots. By Denise Chow 13 January 2011. The Case Against the Moon: Why We Shouldn't Go Straight Back. Copyright © 2021 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes. And the tedious and expensive task of getting there and finding a way to sustain ourselves out there isn’t even close to being worth it. From dealing with the rocket to creating a viable environment for the astronauts, here are some reasons why sending humans to Mars in four years from now is still a dream. Average temperatures on Mars are similar to Antarctica. A counterargument anticipates what “the other side” might say and answers possible objections with reasons and evidence. Here, Eugene Cernan poses next to the American Flag on the lunar surface. Not to mention a significantly lower level of gravity. When it comes to colonizing outer space, Mars gets most of the attention, but there are also some very compelling reasons why we should colonize Titan. I also run in Ebb Media, an independent media company. No cheap ride: Apollo 17 Commander Eugene Cernan knew how to get around the Moon in style. Twitter. Ok we're onto the second reason why we should not go to Mars. With the golden era of human spaceflight now a long way behind us, everything has the appearance of stagnation about it. Complete the activities in your Reader/Writer Notebook. The only reason the entire planet isn't covered in ice is because it has so little water to turn into ice, and as the atmosphere is a near vacuum, the ice sublimates into water vapour (like dry ice) and collects at the poles. And I'm sure none of that is nearly as good as it sounds. Today, astronauts aren't doing any exploring. Who can even envision the incredible feeling of being the first human in history to step out of the capsule and leave your footprint on the surface of Mars? We belong to the Earth, not the other way around. It would be interesting to know. That reason is That we almost did not achieve the Moon manned missions. Image: NASA. That's exactly the sort of thing that human civilization needs here at the dawn of the 21st century. In the 1960's and early 1970's America was in heavily entrenched in the Vietnam War, the American people were divided, with a large potion severely frustrated with their government. The lean towards robots for space exploration is even more pronounced when considering timelines. Scientists who studied Martian meteorites determined that microbial life is a possibility on the red planet, and hot springs … Image: NASA. Mars used to be a … And for the lofty price-tag that it would entail, we could potentially launch dozens of cutting-edge robotic probes, each capable of collecting useful, knowledge-enriching scientific data. We age less when travelling through space. Map Marker Today, we have robots like Curiosity on the surface of Mars, essentially playing the role of a field geologist on another planet. Comparatively, Apollo should be meticulously studied as the archetypal human space program. What can one eat on Mars? Jupiter can take 5 years or longer, depending on how big the launch vehicle is. Three reasons why we shouldn't go to Mars. That being said, cancelling NASA's human spaceflight program as it stands today wouldn't be the worst idea ever. And when it comes to exploring space, sending robots can be several orders of magnitude cheaper than sending humans. And for New Horizons, getting to Pluto took 10 years. An astronaut ages approximately 15 per cent less than observers on Earth. “Why We Shouldn’t Go to Mars” for Time magazine. They would carry with them their earthly microbes. Rather than continue on after the Moon landings and aim for Mars, the role of human astronauts in actual space exploration declined rather quickly. It would take well over a year to get there, work there and come back. Lots of people are fond of this idea, considering the fact that a large sum of our Earth is trashed at this point, and is slowly dying. “There will be persistent mechanical noise and vibration, sleep disturbances, unbearable tedium, trance states, depression, monotonous repetition of meals, clothing, routines, conversations and so on,” Ed Regis details. “Nobody’s gonna go settle on Mars and raise a family and have generations of Martians,” said Nye. When the the first Apollo mission landed on the moon they only had 30 seconds of fuel left, 30 SECONDS! That was back in 1972, nearly 45 years ago. text analysis: counterargument A strong counterargument is an important part of any argument. Sending a manned mission to Mars is a fantastic adventure. Why wouldn’t we want a fresh start? Website Bad Philosopher is a digital magazine that explores topics related to the future of humanity. We were given this planet as our home, which leaves us with the responsibility to care for it. For these reasons and more, sending humans for long-duration missions to Mars would be unwise. 10 Foodie finds. In order to move forward, we need to adopt a shared goal and a detailed method of achieving it—perhaps even as a global community.